Add Additional Operators to Model Rules
C
Craig Walker
Currently only the "equals" and "not equals" operators are available for data/property linking to model elements.
In order to provide more options and flexibility to this linking, please consider the addition of other standard data query operators commonly used in various programming languages and databases, such as:
Equals (=): Matches records where the specified attribute is equal to a given value - Currently Available
Not equals (!= or <>): Matches records where the specified attribute is not equal to a given value - Currently Available
Contains: Matches records where the specified attribute contains a specific substring or value.
Not contains: Matches records where the specified attribute does not contain a specific substring or value.
In: Matches records where the specified attribute is included in a list of given values.
Not in: Matches records where the specified attribute is not included in a list of given values.
Between: Matches records where the specified attribute is within a range of values.
Greater than (>): Matches records where the specified attribute is greater than a given value.
Less than (<): Matches records where the specified attribute is less than a given value.
Akos Hamar
Combining these two valuable pieces of feedback for consideration.
Akos Hamar
Merged in a post:
Add "and" logic option to "model rules"
Macol Liang
I know there are other ways to implement the "and" logic, just curious that "model rules" does not provide the "and" logic option.